HOW INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES ARE COPING WITH CHALLENGES: STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS TO COPE WITH THEIR CHALLENGES. E.G COMPETITION IN KENYA
Multinational corporations (MNCs) operate in a global environment unfamiliar in political, economic, social, cultural, technological and legal aspects. Increased competition among multinational corporations and the entry of other players in the Kenyan market necessitate the design of competitive strategies that guarantee performance. Creating strategies for coping with competition is the heart of strategic management which is critical for the long term survival of any organization. Multinational entities have played a major role in international trade for several centuries. A number of multinational corporations (MNCs) from developing economies are becoming key players in the global economy.
Multinational corporations (MNCs) operate in a global environment unfamiliar in political, economic, social, cultural, technological and legal aspects. Increased competition among multinational corporations and the entry of other players in the Kenyan market necessitate the design of competitive strategies that guarantee performance. Creating strategies for coping with competition is the heart of strategic management which is critical for the long term survival of any organization. Multinational entities have played a major role in international trade for several centuries. A number of multinational corporations (MNCs) from developing economies are becoming key players in the global economy.
COMPETITIVE
STRATEGIES
Competitive strategy specifies the distinctive approach which the
firm intends to use in order to succeed in each of the strategic business
areas. Competitive strategy gives a company an advantage over its rivals in
attracting customers and defending against competitive forces
(Ansoff, 1985). There are many roots to competitive advantage, but
the most basic is to provide buyers with what they perceive to be of superior
value a good or service at a low price, a superior service that is worth paying
more for, or a best value offering that represents an attractive combination of
prices, features, quality, service, and other attributes that buyers find
attractive (Thompson and Strickland, 2003).Competitive strategy is thus the
search for a favorable competitive position, in an industry, the fundamental
arena in which competition occurs. Competitive strategy aims to establish a
profitable and sustainable position against the forces that determine industry
competition (Porter, 1998).
Firms pursue competitive strategies when they seek to improve or
maintain their performance through independent actions in a specific market or industry.
COST
LEADERSHIP STRATEGY
A firm producing at the lowest cost in the industry enjoys the
best profits. Producing at lower cost is a strategy that can be used by various
firms so as to have a significant cost advantage over the competition in the
market. This in effect leads to growth in the market share. This strategy is
mostly associated with large business is offering standard products that are
clearly different from competitors who may target a broader group of customers.
The low cost leader in any market gains competitive advantage from being able
to many to produce at the lowest cost. Factories are built and maintained;
labor is recruited and trained to deliver the lowest possible costs of
production. Cost advantage is the focus. Cost s is shaved off every element of
the value chain. Products tend to be 'no frills.' However, low cost does not
always lead to low price. Producers could price at competitive parity,
exploiting the benefits of a bigger margin than competitors. Some
organizations, such as Toyota,
are very good not only at producing high quality autos at a low price, but have
the brand and marketing skills to use a premium pricing policy. A low cost
leader’s basis for competitive advantage is lower overall costs than
competitors. The need to manage cost is nothing new, yet surprising number of
organizations struggles to successfully control their operating expenses
overtime (Bertone, Clark, West & Groves, 2009). Successful low cost leaders
are exceptionally good at finding ways to drive costs out of their business.
COST
FOCUS STRATEGY
Lower cost advantages to a section of the market segments with
basic services offered to a higher priced market leader is a strategy acceptable
in the corporate world. It results to similar products to much higher priced
products that can also be acceptable to sufficient customers in the market. A
focused strategy based on low cost aims at securing a competitive advantage by
serving buyers in the target market niche at a lower price than rival
competitors. This strategy has considerable attraction when a firm can lower
costs significantly by limiting its customer base to a well defined buyer
segment. Focused low cost strategies are fairly common (Porter, 1996).
Differentiation Focus Strategy A business aims to differentiate within one or a
number of target market segments. The special customer needs of the segment
means that there are opportunities to provide products that are clearly different
from competitors who may be targeting a broader group of customers. This
demands that the customer’s different needs and wants be recognized. Porter
(1980) reiterates that only if a company makes a strong and unwavering
commitment to one of the generic competitive strategies does it stand much
chance of achieving sustainable competitive advantage that such strategies can
deliver if properly executed. Many scholars have questioned this; in
particular, Miller (1992) questions the notion of being “caught in the middle”.
He claims that there is a viable middle ground between strategies. Many
companies for example, have entered a market as a niche player and gradually
expanded. Hill (1988) claimed that Porter’s model was flawed because
differentiation can be a means for firms to achieve low cost. He proposed that
a combination of differentiation and low cost might be necessary for firms to
achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
CONCLUSIONS
Regarding the key objective of the paper, It was established that
MNCs in Kenya have adopted a number of strategies including: better quality,
excellent customer service, innovation, differentiation, diversification, cost
cutting measures, strategic alliances, joint venture, mergers/acquisitions and
lower prices to whether competitive challenges. The study also found that 61
percent of the multinational corporations are foreign owned, while 39% are both
locally and foreign owned suggesting that the majority of the MNCs are owned by
non citizens. Ownership may be important
in the choice of strategy an organization. Foreign MNCs sometimes have to
pursue the strategies of its foreign based company. Multinationals can overcome
the challenges through training and other capacity building programmes to
create a pull of qualified personnel to support operation especially by
providing a focused onsite customer care.
REFERENCES
Aharoni, Y. (1993). “From Adam Smith to Schumpeterian Global
Firms.” Research in Global Strategic Management. JAI Press Inc. Ansoff, H. I. (1965).
Corporate Strategy. New York:
McGraw-Hill. Aosa, E. (1992). An empirical investigation of aspects of strategy
formulation and implementation within large, private manufacturing companies in
Kenya Unpublished PhD Thesis. Barnett, W. P., & Hansen, M. T. (1996). “The
Red Queen in Organizational evolution.” Strategic Management Journal. Barman
& Chaves, M. (2005). “St rateg y and restructure at the United Church of
Christ.” pp. 466-492. Chaffee, E. (1985). “Three models of strategy.”
Miller, D. (1989). Configuration of Strategy and Structure:
Towards a Synthesis.
New York:
Free press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and
sustaining superior performance. New
York: Free Press
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy.
Havard business Review,
March/April 1979. Stern, C. W., & Stalk Jr, G. (1998).
Perspectives on Strategy from The Boston
Consulting Group. Boston Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons. Su
shil. (1990). “Corporate Financial Reporting in India Corporate Financial
Reporting.” Penguin
books.
Thompson, A. A Jr, & Strickland, A. J. III. (2003). “Strategic management:
http://www.the manager.org/models/diamond.htm
(2007, 08). Discuss the Management Problems
Facing Multinational Companies and Companies with an International Dimension in
Various Parts of the World.StudyMode.com. Retrieved 08, 2007, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Discuss-The-Management-Problems-Facing-Multinational-120224.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/multinational-corporation-MNC.html#ixzz393FDRiMT
http://www.unilever.com/sustainability/strategy/
Read more: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/issues-faced-by-the-multinational-companies-business-essay.php#ixzz393bNdhcs
No comments:
Post a Comment