SEPARATING RELIGION FROM POLITIC IN NIGERIA
The need for political stability in Nigeria cannot be overemphasized. Indeed, all segments of the Nigerian society (religious or cultural) are interested in the political future of the nation. However, this interest is approached from various dimensions. A major interest in the Nigerian polity is the relationship between religion and politics.
The Nigerian
society is religiously pluralized and this significantly influences political
decisions and
policies of the
nation. On the other hand, there are people who hold the strong opinion that
this relationship should not be stressed and that religion and politics should
be allowed to operate separately without one interfering with the other. Those
who hold this view argued essentially from the position that religion mixed
with politics is mostly like to imbibe various vices associated with politics.
Also politics may not be properly and dispassionately played if mixed with
religion.
Basic Terms Used
RELIGION: A unified system of
belief and practices which unite into one moral community all those who adhere
to them (Aderibigbe and Aiyegboyin, 1997: 7) The two major religion found in
Nigeria is Christianity and Islam.
POLITICS: The struggle for power
which itself is the authority to determine or formulate and
execute
decisions and policies, which must be accepted by the society……it is the
struggle for
power of
governance, especially executive authority.
In recent
decades, religion has become an important factor both in public debates and as
a means of political mobilization in Nigeria.
Today, Muslim
and Christian communities and organizations in Nigeria are publicly questioning
the legitimacy of secular post- colonial state. One reason for the importance
of this topic is that religions often make strong claims on people’s
allegiance, and universal religions make claims on all the people rather than
just a particular community. The extent and form of this support is as
important to political thinkers as is the possibility for conflict.
The voting
patterns of the 2011 presidential election reveals more clearly the extent to
which religion has penetrated Nigerian politics, creating a blueprint for
division with the Muslim-dominated north potentially separated from the
Christian-dominated south. This version of the separation is quite a tempting
one as Nigerians are a deeply religious people whose sense of community is
intimately related and influenced by spiritual values. Yet such values as
loving one’s neighbour as one’s self, turning the other cheek and charity have
scarcely been translated across the religious divide.
The increasing
lethality of religious fundamentalist groups such as Boko Haram, as well as the
killing of over 2,000 civilians by Muslims and Christians in Jos, has raised
serious questions about the viability of a united Nigeria. While many will
argue that Nigeria’s federalism has achieved a great feat in keeping the
country together, preserving its diversity and allowing for 12 out of its 36
constituent states to implement sharia law, the need for peace and rapid
sustainable development now overshadows such voices.
Furthermore,
the state’s responses to such violence and insecurities have been largely
ineffective and counter-productive. The extra-judicial killings carried out by
the Nigerian army in Jos, as well as the lackadaisical attitude of President
Jonathan, have all served to ‘fan the flames’ of state failure.
The argument
is that a Nigeria separated along a religious
divide may allow for northern and southern Nigeria to develop as independent
states, where religion transcends ethnicity to create stronger national
identities. This will then serve as the fulcrum for stability, allowing for
rapid economic development. While many “southerners to-be” would be keen to
explore this road because of the economic viability of the region, others are
worried about the “to-be north” as a potential source of regional insecurity.
Moreover, many are weary that this is a path that leads us backward rather than
forward, and cannot be trod without the bloodshed already experienced during
the Biafran civil war of 1967 - 1970.
After a cross
examination and re-examination of various literature and evidences seen above
it is very important to clearly separate religion from politics so that
politics will not be adversely affected with any form of religious practices in
the country. This can be achieved through the enactment of laws and policies
which will discourage the negative influence of religion on politics and clearly
separating that which is religiously accepted and that which is politically
accepted in Nigeria.
No comments:
Post a Comment