THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS IN MAINTAINING INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY.
The maintenance of international peace and security represents the primary purpose behind the establishment of the United Nation. It reflects the intentions and desire of it founders who sought to establish an international organization for achieving this end. It is a prerequisite to any other purpose of the United Nations. Without it no friendly relations, no international cooperation, and no harmonization of nation’s action could be achieved. Because of the importance of international peace and security, the founders of the United Nation insisted on it and emphasized it in the preamble and the charter of the organization. They stated all the possible principles, methods and procedures which are to be followed to attain this end.
The
theme “We are going to create a collective security system, and this time we
are going to make it work” dominated the entire process of planning and
formulating the United Nations.
Charter
(2) the charter provided a system for the pacific settlement or adjustment of
disputes, and the use of collective measures in threat to or breaches of peace
and acts of aggression.
The
first method provided by the system is that of seeking peaceful settlement or
adjustment of disputes and situation by peaceful means listed in the charter.
The second method is that of taking collective actions (measures) of a coercive
nature for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace and for the
suppression of acts of aggression and
other breach of the peace. Through these two methods delineated in chapter VI
entitled “Pacific settlement of disputes” and chapter VII entitled “Actions
with respect to Threats to the peace, breaches of the peace, and act of
aggression” of the chapter, the United Nations primarily exercises its role in
maintaining international peace and security.
-
Pacific
Settlement Of Disputes (3)
Chapter VI of the chapter of the United Nations contain the
procedures for the pacific settlement of disputes. Article 33 obliges the
parties to a dispute, “the continuance of which is likely to endanger the
maintenance of international peace and security” to seek a solution by
“negotiation, cancellation, arbitration judicial settlement, resort to regional
agencies or arrangement, or other peaceful means of their own choice;
(4) under this article, any part to any dispute which is
likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security is
obligated to seek, first of all, a settlement by the traditional peaceful
procedures already established in international law.
In the contemplation of the chapter, the first recourse of
nations in dispute should be to any of the peaceful methods, in a manner that
international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered. This
position is justified, first on the grounds that it will relieve the United
Nations of the burden of handling too large number of controversies and, on the
second, that will minimize the interference of the united nation in the affairs
of sovereign.
(5) However, should the parties to a dispute fail to observe
their obligation under articles 33 or their attempts be unsuccessful, the
United Nations would intervene to consider the matters and to give it
recommendations and decisions under the charter. The security council is given
the primary responsibility regarding peace and security. Whatever the action
taken by the parties, they cannot prejudice the right of the security council
to intervene by inter-investigation or recommendation of appropriate procedures
or method of adjustment or settlement of any dispute which is likely to
endanger international peace and security. The security council is entitled to
intervene either by it own initiative (6) upon invitation of any member of the
United Nations, (7) upon a call of attention by the General Assembly (8) upon a
call of attention by the Secretary General, (9) or upon a complaint for a party
to a dispute (10) to discharge its duty for maintaining international peace and
security, the security council may follow three courses of action. Firstly, the
security council may call upon the parties to a dispute, the continuance of
which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and
security, to settle their dispute by any of the peaceful means listed in
article 33. (11) secondly, it may in case of dispute of the nature referred to
in article 33, recommend “appropriate procedure or methods of adjustment” (12)
thirdly, it may recommend “terms of settlement as it may consider appropriate”.
(13) Although under the charter the security council is given the primary role
for maintaining international peace and security. The general assembly may call
the attention of the security council to situations which are likely to
endanger the maintenance of international peace and security. (14) It may
discourse any question relating to the maintenance of international peace and
security, and may make recommendations with regards to any dispute or situation
to the concerned state or to the security council or to both. (15) It may
recommend measures for the peaceful adjustment of any situation, regardless of
origin, which it deems likely to impair the general welfare or friendly
relations among nations, (16) questions, disputes or situation may be brought
before the general assembly by the security council (17) by any member of the
United Nations (18) or by any state which is a party to a dispute (19).
However, the General Assembly is prevented from making any recommendation with
regards to any dispute or situation while the security council is exercising it
function in respect of it, unless the council so request (20) this is a
limitation imposed on the authority the general assembly in making
recommendation relating to the maintenance of international peace and security.
In practice with regard to the pacific settlement of disputes
(or “Peacemaking” as it may be known), (21) The United Nation has provided various
means through which conflicts, disputes, and situations are contained and
resolved. (22) The security council has applied all the available diplomatic
techniques in various international disputes, in addition to open debate and
behind the scenes discussion and lobbying, it has called upon the parties to a
dispute to resort to any peaceful means of their own choice to settle their
disputes, it has recommended to the parties specific appropriate procedures or
method of adjustment. It has recommended to the parties specific appropriate
procedures or method of adjustment.
It has recommended to the parties way to resolve their
disputes or terms of settlement. (23) it has dispatched special envoys or
mission for specific takes such as investigation, fact finding, or negotiation.
It has requested the secretary general to assist the parties in reaching a
settlement to their disputes, the impartially of the secretary General is one of
the United Nations’ assets. The secretary General has taken diplomatic
initiatives to encourage and maintain the momentum of negotiations. He has used
his “good offices” for mediating, or to exercise “preventive diplomacy”. That
is to take actions in order to prevent
dispute from arising. To resolve them before they escalate into
conflicts or to limit the speed of
conflicts when they occur. In many instances, the secretary General has been
instructed to avert threats to peace or to secure peace agreements.
To foster the maintenance of peace, the General
assembly has held special or emergency special sessions on issues such as
disarmament, and the question of Palestine,
over years, it has helped promote peaceful relations among nations by adopting
declarations on peace, the peaceful settlement of disputes and international
co-operation. It has established investigatory organs to examine matters under
consideration by it. It has established subsidiary organs for observation,
mediation, conciliation and good offices.
Under chapter vi relating the specific settlement of
disputes and other articles of charter or the united nations, the security
council and General Assembly may exercise their role in maintaining
international peace and security by discussions, investigations and
recommendations. But the possibility remains that pacific settlement may fail
to resolve the disputes which may become so serious as to constitute threats to or breaches of the peace or acts
of aggression. In such cases, the United Nations may intervene by taking
collective action of coercive nature for the prevention and removal of the consequence of such disputes.
-
Collective
Enforcement Actions
The
method of using collective enforcement (coercive) action by the united nations
is provided by chapter vii of the charter and the provisions of the “uniting
for peace” resolution (24)
(A) chapter vii of the charter
(25)
Chapter
vii authorise the security council to deal with threat to the peace, or act of
aggression and to collective enforcement actions (measures)in order to maintain
or restore international peace and security. The security council under article
39, the first article of chapter vii is given as wide discretion in determining
“make recommendations”, or to “decide what measures shall be taken in
accordance with articles 41 and 42 to maintain or restore international peace
and security”, such a determination under Article 39 is an essential pre-condition
to the operation of chapter vii of the charter; the security council cannot
exercise its power under this chapter, particularly article 41 and 42 without
such a determination made expressly or implicitly.
(B) Uniting for Peace Resolution
The
uniting for peace resolution grants the general Assembly the power to act in
place of the security council if the latter fails, because of the lack of
unanimity of its permanent members, to discharge it primary responsibility in
maintaining international peace and security in any case where there appears to
be a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act aggression. (36) under
this resolution, the general Assembly may do by recommendation anything the
security council may do by decision under chapter vii of the charter.
(C) United Nation Forces
The
use of military forces by the united nations for the purpose of maintaining and
restoring international peace and security represent the effective measures
which may be employed by the organization under the occasions, the united
nation has established international military forces.
The
U.N force which was established in korea in 1950
was the only force of peace enforcing nature. The united nations electoral assistances important feature in united
nation peace operation, in 2005 and 2006, U.N peace- keeping forces supported election in six post
conflict countries. Afgharistan, Burundi Haiti, Iraz, Liberia and the
democratic republic of the congo-with populations totalling over 120 million.
This
was case of unified command in korea
(1950-1953). See Abdullarahim, the united nations and the maintenance of
international peace and security pp
REFERENCE
Dr. Walid Abdularahim professor of
law. Private site for legal research and studies.
No comments:
Post a Comment